personally idk y a lot of the maor clans have ppl with such wierd names. i dont think you shuld put a bunch of stuff on ur name like | or * or Th i think a solid name wuld command more respect and generally makes more sense. e.g. acropolips, wolf, ect...
#M|A#.TayituUx* is an example of sumthing that is meh... like ive seen ratio whores on hi skill change their name by one * if they are having a bad game which is stupid. (and underhanded) having a solid name will also free you from any accusations of doing this.
Lutalo
Posts : 3 Join date : 2009-12-23
Subject: Re: DK or not? Wed May 12, 2010 8:31 am
might i also suggest a sig. like blacky's
SiL3nT
Posts : 372 Join date : 2009-11-17 Age : 27 Location : Czech
Subject: Re: DK or not? Wed May 12, 2010 9:57 am
f2. =CTK='s names shouldn't change to that type. We all have simple names with very brief and few x-tra signs. That wouldn't pass with the tag. mb for xW it would but not for CTK...
Keep DK, don't change it. I don't want to get into the MyS thing, they're doing right now, and even aCKa. Just to make them look as they have many members.
NO[b]
Tatii
Posts : 105 Join date : 2010-04-09 Age : 30 Location : Hockey's World ;D
Subject: Re: DK or not? Thu May 13, 2010 7:10 pm
Well DK is good, if u really want change the name tell me i can help u with some names i got a lot